Zhipu AI · Zhipu AI
GLM-5.2 vs GLM-5.3
Compare GLM-5.2 (Zhipu AI) and GLM-5.3 (Zhipu AI) on benchmarks, capabilities, and pricing.
At a glance
| GLM-5.2 | GLM-5.3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Zhipu AI | Zhipu AI |
| Context | 1M tokens | 1M tokens |
| Modality | Text only | Text only |
| Pricing | Pro | Pro |
| Speed | Medium | Medium |
| Reasoning | Expert | Expert |
Benchmarks
GLM-5.2
- AA Intelligence Index
- Output speed
- 71.95tokens/sConfiguration: Prompt length: 1,000 · Parallel queries: 1Artificial Analysis · Date unknownAge unknown
- API input cost
- API output cost
- Context window
- 1MCatalog · As of Aug 11, 2026Stale · 31d old
Benchmark variant: GLM-5.2 (max)
AA data retrieved Sep 11, 2026 · Artificial Analysis
GLM-5.3
- AA Intelligence Index
- Output speed
- 53.45tokens/sConfiguration: Prompt length: 1,000 · Parallel queries: 1Artificial Analysis · Date unknownAge unknown
- API input cost
- API output cost
- Context window
- 1MCatalog · As of Aug 24, 2026Within 30d
Benchmark variant: GLM-5.3 (max)
AA data retrieved Sep 11, 2026 · Artificial Analysis
Try both on yno.ai
Switch between GLM-5.2 and GLM-5.3 per task with one account.
Frequently asked
- Which is faster, GLM-5.2 or GLM-5.3?
- GLM-5.2 is rated medium and GLM-5.3 is rated medium. yno.ai surfaces output-speed scores from Artificial Analysis on each model's detail page so you can compare exact tokens-per-second figures for your workload.
- Which is cheaper, GLM-5.2 or GLM-5.3?
- GLM-5.2 is on the pro tier in yno.ai; GLM-5.3 is on the pro tier. See the pricing page for the latest per-tier limits.
- Which is better for Self-hosted coding AI?
- Both models support Self-hosted coding AI. GLM-5.2 brings MIT-licensed weights; GLM-5.3 brings Vendor-reported DeepSWE v1.1 66.9. Run a side-by-side eval on your prompts in yno.ai to see which fits your workload.
- Can I use both GLM-5.2 and GLM-5.3 in yno.ai?
- Yes. Both are available on yno.ai under your single account; you can route different stages of an agent to different models or A/B test them on the same prompt without per-provider boilerplate.