Anthropic · Zhipu AI
Claude Opus 4.8 vs GLM-5.2
Compare Claude Opus 4.8 (Anthropic) and GLM-5.2 (Zhipu AI) on benchmarks, capabilities, and pricing.
At a glance
| Claude Opus 4.8 | GLM-5.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Zhipu AI |
| Context | 1M tokens | 1M tokens |
| Modality | Multimodal | Text only |
| Pricing | Max | Pro |
| Speed | Medium | Medium |
| Reasoning | Expert | Expert |
Benchmarks
Claude Opus 4.8
- AA Intelligence Index
- Output speed
- API input cost
- API output cost
- Context window
- 1MCatalog · As of Aug 11, 2026Stale · 31d old
Benchmark variant: Claude Opus 4.8 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
AA data retrieved Sep 11, 2026 · Artificial Analysis
GLM-5.2
- AA Intelligence Index
- Output speed
- 71.95tokens/sConfiguration: Prompt length: 1,000 · Parallel queries: 1Artificial Analysis · Date unknownAge unknown
- API input cost
- API output cost
- Context window
- 1MCatalog · As of Aug 11, 2026Stale · 31d old
Benchmark variant: GLM-5.2 (max)
AA data retrieved Sep 11, 2026 · Artificial Analysis
Try both on yno.ai
Switch between Claude Opus 4.8 and GLM-5.2 per task with one account.
Frequently asked
- Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.8 or GLM-5.2?
- Claude Opus 4.8 is rated medium and GLM-5.2 is rated medium. yno.ai surfaces output-speed scores from Artificial Analysis on each model's detail page so you can compare exact tokens-per-second figures for your workload.
- Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or GLM-5.2?
- Claude Opus 4.8 is on the max tier in yno.ai; GLM-5.2 is on the pro tier. See the pricing page for the latest per-tier limits.
- Which is better for Complex software engineering?
- Both models support Complex software engineering. Claude Opus 4.8 brings 1M context / 128K output; GLM-5.2 brings MIT-licensed weights. Run a side-by-side eval on your prompts in yno.ai to see which fits your workload.
- Can I use both Claude Opus 4.8 and GLM-5.2 in yno.ai?
- Yes. Both are available on yno.ai under your single account; you can route different stages of an agent to different models or A/B test them on the same prompt without per-provider boilerplate.