Skip to main content

    Anthropic · OpenAI

    Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5.5

    Compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.5 (OpenAI) on benchmarks, capabilities, and pricing.

    At a glance

    Claude Sonnet 4.5GPT-5.5
    ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
    Context200K tokens1M tokens
    ModalityMultimodalMultimodal
    PricingProMax
    SpeedFastMedium
    ReasoningAdvancedExpert

    Benchmarks

    Claude Sonnet 4.5

    AA Intelligence Index
    19.3points
    Artificial Analysis · Date unknownAge unknown
    Output speed
    98tokens/s
    Artificial Analysis · As of Aug 11, 2026Stale · 31d old
    API input cost
    $3.00/ 1M tokens
    Artificial Analysis · Date unknownAge unknown
    API output cost
    $15.00/ 1M tokens
    Artificial Analysis · Date unknownAge unknown
    Context window
    200K
    Catalog · As of Aug 11, 2026Stale · 31d old

    Benchmark variant: Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)

    AA data retrieved Sep 11, 2026 · Artificial Analysis

    GPT-5.5

    AA Intelligence Index
    38.6points
    Artificial Analysis · Date unknownAge unknown
    Output speed
    134tokens/s
    Artificial Analysis · As of Aug 11, 2026Stale · 31d old
    API input cost
    $5.00/ 1M tokens
    Artificial Analysis · Date unknownAge unknown
    API output cost
    $30.00/ 1M tokens
    Artificial Analysis · Date unknownAge unknown
    Context window
    1M
    Catalog · As of Aug 11, 2026Stale · 31d old

    Benchmark variant: GPT-5.5 (xhigh)

    AA data retrieved Sep 11, 2026 · Artificial Analysis

    When to pick Claude Sonnet 4.5

    Pick Claude Sonnet 4.5 for production coding agents that edit multi-file repositories, long-context document review across 200K+ tokens, and customer-facing assistants where tone consistency matters. It suits teams already building on Anthropic tool-use patterns, structured XML prompts, and workflows that lean on careful instruction-following over raw breadth.

    When to pick GPT-5.5

    Pick GPT-5.5 for general-purpose product features tapping the wider OpenAI ecosystem: Assistants API, function calling, vision, and image generation in one stack. It fits teams shipping consumer chat experiences, multimodal pipelines mixing text and images, and applications that benefit from broad plugin and SDK support across languages.

    Try both on yno.ai

    Switch between Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-5.5 per task with one account.

    Frequently asked

    Which is faster, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-5.5?
    Claude Sonnet 4.5 is rated fast and GPT-5.5 is rated medium. yno.ai surfaces output-speed scores from Artificial Analysis on each model's detail page so you can compare exact tokens-per-second figures for your workload.
    Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-5.5?
    Claude Sonnet 4.5 is on the pro tier in yno.ai; GPT-5.5 is on the max tier. See the pricing page for the latest per-tier limits.
    Which is better for Full-stack development?
    Both models support Full-stack development. Claude Sonnet 4.5 brings Text and image input; GPT-5.5 brings 1.05M context / 128K output. Run a side-by-side eval on your prompts in yno.ai to see which fits your workload.
    Can I use both Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-5.5 in yno.ai?
    Yes. Both are available on yno.ai under your single account; you can route different stages of an agent to different models or A/B test them on the same prompt without per-provider boilerplate.

    Related comparisons