Skip to main content

    Anthropic · DeepSeek

    Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

    Compare Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic) and DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek) on benchmarks, capabilities, and pricing.

    At a glance

    Claude Opus 4.7DeepSeek V4 Pro
    ProviderAnthropicDeepSeek
    Context1M tokens1M tokens
    ModalityMultimodalText only
    PricingMaxMax
    SpeedMediumMedium
    ReasoningExpertExpert

    Benchmarks

    Claude Opus 4.7

    AA Intelligence Index
    40.7points
    Artificial Analysis · Date unknownAge unknown
    Output speed
    72tokens/s
    Artificial Analysis · As of Aug 11, 2026Stale · 31d old
    API input cost
    $5.00/ 1M tokens
    Artificial Analysis · Date unknownAge unknown
    API output cost
    $25.00/ 1M tokens
    Artificial Analysis · Date unknownAge unknown
    Context window
    1M
    Catalog · As of Aug 11, 2026Stale · 31d old

    Benchmark variant: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)

    AA data retrieved Sep 11, 2026 · Artificial Analysis

    DeepSeek V4 Pro

    AA Intelligence Index
    36.3points
    Artificial Analysis · Date unknownAge unknown
    Output speed
    69.68tokens/s
    Configuration: Prompt length: 1,000 · Parallel queries: 1
    Artificial Analysis · Date unknownAge unknown
    API input cost
    $1.32/ 1M tokens
    Artificial Analysis · Date unknownAge unknown
    API output cost
    $3.96/ 1M tokens
    Artificial Analysis · Date unknownAge unknown
    Context window
    1M
    Catalog · As of Aug 13, 2026Within 30d

    Benchmark variant: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort)

    AA data retrieved Sep 11, 2026 · Artificial Analysis

    When to pick Claude Opus 4.7

    Pick Claude Opus 4.7 when your team wants a managed flagship with steady update cadence, integrated safety tooling, and Anthropic-hosted infrastructure. It fits product teams shipping customer-facing assistants, agentic workflows with tool use, and engineering tasks where you prefer vendor-managed inference and predictable API contracts over running your own GPU fleet.

    When to pick DeepSeek V4 Pro

    Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro when self-hosting matters for sovereignty, compliance, or unit economics. The open weights suit regulated industries running inside their own VPC, research labs needing reproducible runs, and high-volume workloads where per-token costs at scale push you toward owned GPUs. Useful when you want to fine-tune on proprietary data without vendor lock-in.

    Try both on yno.ai

    Switch between Claude Opus 4.7 and DeepSeek V4 Pro per task with one account.

    Frequently asked

    Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.7 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?
    Claude Opus 4.7 is rated medium and DeepSeek V4 Pro is rated medium. yno.ai surfaces output-speed scores from Artificial Analysis on each model's detail page so you can compare exact tokens-per-second figures for your workload.
    Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?
    Claude Opus 4.7 is on the max tier in yno.ai; DeepSeek V4 Pro is on the max tier. See the pricing page for the latest per-tier limits.
    Which is better for Complex software engineering?
    Both models support Complex software engineering. Claude Opus 4.7 brings Software engineering; DeepSeek V4 Pro brings 1M context. Run a side-by-side eval on your prompts in yno.ai to see which fits your workload.
    Can I use both Claude Opus 4.7 and DeepSeek V4 Pro in yno.ai?
    Yes. Both are available on yno.ai under your single account; you can route different stages of an agent to different models or A/B test them on the same prompt without per-provider boilerplate.

    Related comparisons